text.skipToContent text.skipToNavigation

Babel von Bauman, Zygmunt (eBook)

  • Erscheinungsdatum: 17.05.2016
  • Verlag: Polity
eBook (ePUB)
15,99 €
inkl. gesetzl. MwSt.
Sofort per Download lieferbar

Online verfügbar


We are living in an open sea, caught up in a continuous wave, with no fixed point and no instrument to measure distance and the direction of travel. Nothing appears to be in its place any more, and a great deal appears to have no place at all. The principles that have given substance to the democratic ethos, the system of rules that has guided the relationships of authority and the ways in which they are legitimized, the shared values and their hierarchy, our behaviour and our life styles, must be radically revised because they no longer seem suited to our experience and understanding of a world in flux, a world that has become both increasingly interconnected and prone to severe and persistent crises. We are living in the interregnum between what is no longer and what is not yet. None of the political movements that helped undermine the old world are ready to inherit it, and there is no new ideology, no consistent vision, promising to give shape to new institutions for the new world. It is like the Babylon referred to by Borges, the country of randomness and uncertainty in which 'no decision is final; all branch into others'. Out of the world that had promised us modernity, what Jean Paul Sartre had summarized with sublime formula 'le choix que je suis' ('the choice that I am'), we inhabit that flattened, mobile and dematerialized space, where as never before the principle of the heterogenesis of purposes is sovereign. This is Babel. Zygmunt Bauman is Professor Emeritus of Sociology at the University of Leeds. Ezio Mauro is an Italian writer and journalist and Editor-in-Chief of La Repubblica.


    Format: ePUB
    Kopierschutz: AdobeDRM
    Seitenzahl: 180
    Erscheinungsdatum: 17.05.2016
    Sprache: Englisch
    ISBN: 9781509507634
    Verlag: Polity
    Größe: 197 kBytes
Weiterlesen weniger lesen


Inside a changing social space

Ezio Mauro It is almost as though the undercurrent of generosity that you see emerging under the pack ice of our time has found no way to express itself. Or at least not in a public form capable of leaving a political mark, of reorganizing structures of value, behaviour and hierarchy. It is unable to turn, as you say, into a philosophy of life, a model, a paradigm, a reference point. One may say that a sum of private generosities - if they do actually exist - does not add up to a collective culture, does not reverse the sign of the times we are living in. We are lacking greater agents able to transform undercurrent into culture, trend into movement, individual gesture into universal meaning. In other words, we are lacking politics. And the spontaneous movements that we are witnessing, these too are far from neutral, they work by breaking apart what they cannot piece back together. A blatant example of this, in my opinion, is the development of the phenomenon of inequality, the new inequalities that that are becoming the trademark of our times. Nobody talks about this any more. And yet these fault lines are tearing our societies apart and - upon closer examination - they carry with them almost all the questions we have raised so far. Of course, inequalities have always existed in our Western societies. But they used to be somehow covered by the sense of 'the whole' that we mentioned and that now no longer exists, or has grown considerably weaker. What are we talking about exactly? The sense of being part of a collective story of unique, free individuals, belonging to different social groups, having various interests and coming from different circumstances, yet still sharing a common vision of development and growth, with shared core values. It is what we call a society. Inequalities used to be tolerated thanks to the offer of a vast array of opportunities. I am referring to universal education, the welfare state, the market for talents, which in many cases managed to compensate imbalances of class, wealth. Even when the weak became aware of such inequalities, they knew nonetheless that they could count on the future of their children, projecting them into better circumstances, investing in a part of that future, increasing their security and their faith in what tomorrow had in store, and thus finding meaning in their commitment to their work and in their role in the complex workings of the machinery of society.

But what were such workings, exactly? First of all, a general trend of growth, the feeling of living in times of disorderly, fragile and maybe even dangerous development, dotted with bubbles of instability: but development nonetheless. Then, the clear and recognizable nature of the various roads to upward social mobility, which were powered by talent, education and by the powerful start of the new forces of technology, with the entire cultural and professional spread that they carried with them. Today those roads are blocked and impassable. All this was probably the last variation of an old socio-political category from past centuries - progress, which kept encouraging us to invest in the future, to think of tomorrow. What we are living nowadays, in contrast, may be read as the end of progress, at least when it is conceived as a unified process. Progresses become plural, and thus each stands on its own; the category breaks into several innovations and regressions that coexist and overlap, without cancelling each other out. And they do this merely by virtue of their separation.

The difference between who is at the top and who falls at the bottom, between those who are safeguarded and those who are expelled is all too noticeable - because this is what we are talking about, the new words capture the new quality of these fault lines. That is why today inequality is the straw that will break the camel's back, disru

Weiterlesen weniger lesen