text.skipToContent text.skipToNavigation

Strangers at Our Door von Bauman, Zygmunt (eBook)

  • Erscheinungsdatum: 20.06.2016
  • Verlag: Polity
eBook (ePUB)
10,99 €
inkl. gesetzl. MwSt.
Sofort per Download lieferbar

Online verfügbar

Strangers at Our Door

Refugees from the violence of wars and the brutality of famished lives have knocked on other people's doors since the beginning of time. For the people behind the doors, these uninvited guests were always strangers, and strangers tend to generate fear and anxiety precisely because they are unknown. Today we find ourselves confronted with an extreme form of this historical dynamic, as our TV screens and newspapers are filled with accounts of a 'migration crisis', ostensibly overwhelming Europe and portending the collapse of our way of life. This anxious debate has given rise to a veritable 'moral panic' - a feeling of fear spreading among a large number of people that some evil threatens the well-being of society. In this short book Zygmunt Bauman analyses the origins, contours and impact of this moral panic - he dissects, in short, the present-day migration panic. He shows how politicians have exploited fears and anxieties that have become widespread, especially among those who have already lost so much - the disinherited and the poor. But he argues that the policy of mutual separation, of building walls rather than bridges, is misguided. It may bring some short-term reassurance but it is doomed to fail in the long run. We are faced with a crisis of humanity, and the only exit from this crisis is to recognize our growing interdependence as a species and to find new ways to live together in solidarity and cooperation, amidst strangers who may hold opinions and preferences different from our own. Zygmunt Bauman is Professor Emeritus of Sociology at the University of Leeds


    Format: ePUB
    Kopierschutz: AdobeDRM
    Seitenzahl: 120
    Erscheinungsdatum: 20.06.2016
    Sprache: Englisch
    ISBN: 9781509512201
    Verlag: Polity
    Größe: 117 kBytes
Weiterlesen weniger lesen

Strangers at Our Door

Floating Insecurity in Search of an Anchor

The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary defines 'security' as a 'condition of being protected from or not exposed to danger' - but, at the same time, as 'something which makes safe; a protection, guard, defence': this makes it one of those not common (yet not uncommon, either) terms that presume/hint/suggest/imply an organic - and so once and for all fixed and sealed - elective affinity linking the condition to the assumed means of attaining it (a sort of unity akin to that which, for instance, is suggested by the term 'nobility'). The condition to which this particular term refers is highly and deeply, as well as unquestionably, appreciated and yearned for by most language users; the approbation and regard bestowed on it by the public rubs off thereby on its acknowledged guards or providers , to which its name also, in one fell swoop, refers. The means bask in the glory of the condition and so share in its undisputed desirability. Once this has been accomplished, a fully predictable pattern of conduct tends to be followed automatically, in the way typical of all conditioned reflexes. Do you feel insecure? Demand and press for more public security services to guard you, and/or buy more security gadgets believed to avert dangers. Or: do the people who elected you to high office complain of feeling insufficiently secure? Hire/ appoint more security guards and allow them also more liberty to act as they consider necessary - however unappetizing or downright loathsome and revolting the actions they might choose turn out to be - and advertise widely what you've done.

A heretofore unknown term - and one still unrecorded in dictionaries available in bookshops - 'securitization' has appeared quite recently in public speech, coined and quickly adopted in the vocabulary of politicians and media people. What this neologism is meant to grasp and denote is the ever more frequent reclassification of something previously thought of as belonging to some other phenomenal category, as an instance of 'insecurity'; recasting followed well-nigh automatically by transferring that something to the domain, charge and supervision of security organs. Not being, of course, the cause of such automatism, the above-mentioned semantic ambiguity no doubt makes its practising easier. Conditioned reflexes can do without lengthy argument and laborious persuasion: the authority of Heidegger's 'das Man' or Sartre's 'l'on' ('this is how things are done, aren't they?') renders them so obvious and self-evident as to be practically unnoticeable and unavailable for questioning. A conditioned reflex itself stays, safely, unreflected upon - at a safe distance from the searchlights of logic. This is why politicians gladly resort to the term's ambiguity: making their task easier and assuring their actions a priori of popular approval - even if not of the promised effects - it helps politicians to convince their constituencies that they are taking their grievances seriously and acting promptly on the mandate those grievances have been presumed to bestow.

Just one example, picked up at random from among the most recent headline news: as the Huffington Post reported shortly after the night of terrorist outrages in Paris:

French President François Hollande said a state of emergency would be declared across France and national borders shut following a spate of attacks in Paris on Friday evening ... 'It is horrifying', Hollande said in a brief statement on television, adding that a cabinet meeting had been called. 'A state of emergency will be declared', he said. 'The second measure will be the closure of national borders', he added. 'We must ensure that no one comes in to commit any act whatsoever, and at the same time make sure that those who have committed these crimes should be arrested if they try to leave the country.

Weiterlesen weniger lesen